WEBVTT 00:00:00.960 --> 00:00:05.383 This week, I took part in quite a few consultations, including some 00:00:05.504 --> 00:00:09.783 with constitutional scholars, and the conclusions were unanimous, 00:00:09.904 --> 00:00:14.719 namely that the referendum question approved by the National Assembly 00:00:14.840 --> 00:00:19.799 last week is unclear and misleading. Therefore, the only rational step 00:00:19.920 --> 00:00:23.526 is that the decision on the referendum question 00:00:23.647 --> 00:00:28.399 is repealed. Today, the Freedom Movement launched an initiative 00:00:28.520 --> 00:00:35.926 to repeat the vote in order to repeal the referendum question. 00:00:36.967 --> 00:00:42.453 At today's meeting, we proposed to all the parties present 00:00:42.633 --> 00:00:46.100 that we launch this initiative together, and I sensed 00:00:46.221 --> 00:00:51.093 a great willingness to get this vote done. 00:00:51.240 --> 00:00:55.593 That was the most significant result of the meeting, 00:00:55.727 --> 00:00:59.533 where we exchanged frank opinions 00:00:59.673 --> 00:01:03.606 on defense and security policy, as well as on what happened 00:01:03.800 --> 00:01:06.833 in the National Assembly last week. 00:01:07.840 --> 00:01:10.913 I'm happy to take your questions. 00:01:12.427 --> 00:01:15.820 Miha Orešnik, N1. Mr. Prime Minister, do you have 00:01:15.941 --> 00:01:18.813 the necessary votes for this proposal, 00:01:18.934 --> 00:01:22.600 at least from the coalition partners? Have you checked 00:01:22.721 --> 00:01:26.953 the level of support for that? What will happen during the vote 00:01:27.099 --> 00:01:29.900 this time? Have you discussed your options 00:01:30.021 --> 00:01:33.306 at today's meeting with the other parties? 00:01:33.767 --> 00:01:37.306 That wasn't the purpose of today's meeting. 00:01:37.447 --> 00:01:40.250 We'll have enough time before the vote 00:01:40.387 --> 00:01:45.640 to ensure the majority that is needed for the repeal. 00:01:45.761 --> 00:01:48.093 I'm sure we'll be successful. 00:01:48.473 --> 00:01:52.153 Žana Vertačnik, POP TV. If we understood you correctly, 00:01:52.274 --> 00:01:55.754 you don't know yet whether you'll file the proposal 00:01:55.875 --> 00:01:58.980 by yourself, as the Freedom Movement, 00:01:59.113 --> 00:02:03.520 or you'll be joined by others? I'm also curious about the timeline. 00:02:03.653 --> 00:02:05.760 The proposal has been filed. 00:02:06.593 --> 00:02:09.153 So you filed it by yourself? -Yes. 00:02:11.933 --> 00:02:14.393 After the meeting. 00:02:15.560 --> 00:02:19.193 Rok Šuligoj, TV Slovenia. Since the second largest 00:02:19.340 --> 00:02:22.866 parliamentary party wasn't present at the meeting, 00:02:22.993 --> 00:02:26.700 how to you see the absence of their representatives 00:02:26.866 --> 00:02:31.699 and what can you expect from them? 00:02:31.860 --> 00:02:36.266 Also, will you, in accordance with today's proposal, 00:02:36.407 --> 00:02:41.493 tie a confidence vote to the vote on the proposal? 00:02:41.613 --> 00:02:45.633 I've already answered the question about the confidence vote. 00:02:45.773 --> 00:02:47.800 My only response in to laugh, 00:02:47.954 --> 00:02:51.506 but I'd like to add that the security of our citizens 00:02:51.647 --> 00:02:56.540 is any government's primary task, and ours in particular. 00:02:56.707 --> 00:03:01.545 Whoever plays political games instead of focusing on security 00:03:01.666 --> 00:03:05.166 isn't acting in a constructive, statesmanlike manner. 00:03:05.294 --> 00:03:09.053 Turning down an invitation to a meeting 00:03:09.174 --> 00:03:12.453 tells us more about them than I could. 00:03:12.687 --> 00:03:18.840 The first time the initiative was voted on, 00:03:18.961 --> 00:03:23.727 a strongly anti-NATO initiative, 00:03:23.860 --> 00:03:27.046 they could make an excuse that they didn't know 00:03:27.167 --> 00:03:30.766 what they were voting on. Now it's obvious to everyone 00:03:30.887 --> 00:03:35.066 that the referendum question isn't just unclear and misleading, 00:03:35.187 --> 00:03:38.240 but that it's aimed against the NATO alliance. 00:03:38.360 --> 00:03:42.046 Anyone who votes for this now won't have the excuse 00:03:42.160 --> 00:03:46.320 of not reading the statement of purpose. I believe this message 00:03:46.480 --> 00:03:51.960 will be considered by everyone, including those who were absent. 00:03:52.607 --> 00:03:58.226 We're curious about your call for a possible second referendum 00:03:58.427 --> 00:04:00.673 on Slovenia's NATO membership. 00:04:00.794 --> 00:04:05.526 As we understood it, the fate of that depended 00:04:05.673 --> 00:04:09.960 on the first, already confirmed referendum. 00:04:11.180 --> 00:04:16.313 Every government wants and needs to have a clear framework in which 00:04:16.440 --> 00:04:21.686 it can carry out its policies, security-related or otherwise. 00:04:21.827 --> 00:04:24.860 When the first unclear and misleading question 00:04:25.032 --> 00:04:30.273 was voted on, a government could have been prevented 00:04:30.420 --> 00:04:33.460 from carrying out security policy. 00:04:33.640 --> 00:04:37.253 That's why we announced that if the referendum question 00:04:37.380 --> 00:04:40.980 were retained, we'd call for a second referendum 00:04:41.160 --> 00:04:47.306 where the people could clearly state whether they wished to remain 00:04:47.460 --> 00:04:51.306 in NATO, whereby we would need to fulfill our obligations, 00:04:51.434 --> 00:04:54.880 or if they wished to leave the alliance. 00:04:55.867 --> 00:04:58.620 If the first referendum didn't take place, 00:04:58.767 --> 00:05:01.760 we wouldn't have called for that referendum. 00:05:01.893 --> 00:05:05.646 I believe that the rational way forward 00:05:05.800 --> 00:05:08.779 is to repeal the referendum question 00:05:08.933 --> 00:05:11.499 as voted on last Friday. 00:05:11.633 --> 00:05:18.000 In this case, our second initiative likely becomes unnecessary. 00:05:20.780 --> 00:05:24.700 But, Mr. Prime Minister, you're now talking about repealing 00:05:24.827 --> 00:05:28.846 the referendum question. To be clear, you suggested 00:05:28.966 --> 00:05:33.559 a repeal of the decision to call a consultative referendum. 00:05:33.747 --> 00:05:38.139 We suggested a vote to repeal the decision 00:05:38.260 --> 00:05:41.540 that was made last week. 00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:52.440 Mr. Prime Minister, in the week since the vote took place, 00:05:52.600 --> 00:05:56.293 it's been said that Slovenia's international reputation 00:05:56.414 --> 00:06:04.266 has suffered. How do you perceive that damage? 00:06:04.447 --> 00:06:09.006 Whom did you speak to this week? Did anyone contact you 00:06:09.160 --> 00:06:13.706 and what was the nature of your conversations? 00:06:13.907 --> 00:06:17.886 I'm convinced that our reputation would suffer the most 00:06:18.027 --> 00:06:21.453 if this or any future government lacked the mandate 00:06:21.627 --> 00:06:26.222 to fulfill NATO obligations while remaining a full member. 00:06:26.500 --> 00:06:31.653 This is why allowing an unclear and misleading referendum 00:06:31.827 --> 00:06:36.266 would cause our reputation to suffer the most. 00:06:36.387 --> 00:06:40.352 I'm confident that the steps we're about to take, including 00:06:40.473 --> 00:06:44.298 today's initiative and the repeal of last week's decision, 00:06:44.419 --> 00:06:48.384 will do the most for this, in terms of responsible statecraft 00:06:48.505 --> 00:06:53.073 and to help Slovenia's reputation. The country will affirm its status 00:06:53.194 --> 00:06:55.673 as a trustworthy ally. 00:06:56.787 --> 00:07:00.060 We can't claim to be a trustworthy ally 00:07:00.234 --> 00:07:06.046 while making light of fulfilling or not fulfilling our obligations. 00:07:09.420 --> 00:07:11.593 A question on another topic. 00:07:11.733 --> 00:07:14.439 Are you familiar with the latest threats 00:07:14.573 --> 00:07:18.933 from the management of Petrol, namely that they plan to close 00:07:19.054 --> 00:07:22.453 30 additional locations? Do you perhaps have a list 00:07:22.574 --> 00:07:24.174 of those locations? 00:07:24.347 --> 00:07:27.026 How do you intend to settle this dispute 00:07:27.147 --> 00:07:31.653 and what is your message to the people in the affected areas? 00:07:31.947 --> 00:07:36.226 First of all, any form of extortion 00:07:36.360 --> 00:07:39.340 to ensure higher prices and profits 00:07:39.520 --> 00:07:43.506 by the management of any company or owner 00:07:43.647 --> 00:07:46.353 is unacceptable to us. 00:07:47.467 --> 00:07:51.580 If we backed down for a single company, Petrol in this case, 00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:57.080 we'd probably face similar extortion attempts from other companies. 00:07:57.754 --> 00:08:01.899 The government is not obligated to ensure anyone has a profit. 00:08:02.020 --> 00:08:05.779 It's obligated to ensure the well-being of the public. 00:08:05.900 --> 00:08:10.207 It's clear that when prices are regulated 00:08:10.340 --> 00:08:13.900 at service stations away from the highway system, 00:08:14.040 --> 00:08:17.533 when comparing the prices on highways, 00:08:17.680 --> 00:08:21.573 the regulated prices were far more affordable. 00:08:21.714 --> 00:08:27.533 The government will ensure that the public's standard of living 00:08:27.647 --> 00:08:30.540 is protected as much as possible. 00:08:30.661 --> 00:08:33.180 That's the only commitment we can make 00:08:33.340 --> 00:08:35.986 and the only task we need to fulfill. 00:08:36.133 --> 00:08:41.933 I find it unfathomable that the management, 00:08:42.054 --> 00:08:45.393 and some owners who are pressuring the management, 00:08:45.514 --> 00:08:49.114 are playing games with the reputation of their company. 00:08:49.235 --> 00:08:52.088 Ultimately, the people are their customers, 00:08:52.209 --> 00:08:55.667 and I have information that some of their customers 00:08:55.788 --> 00:08:59.007 are beginning to turn their backs to the company 00:08:59.128 --> 00:09:01.520 because of its monopolist extortion. 00:09:01.641 --> 00:09:06.381 Are you familiar with the details? -Just what I learned from the media. 00:09:06.502 --> 00:09:10.145 Do you know which locations we're talking about? 00:09:10.266 --> 00:09:13.799 Mr. Prime Minister, I'd like to return to the topic 00:09:13.987 --> 00:09:17.553 of today's meeting. It seems that the referendum snag 00:09:17.674 --> 00:09:21.720 created tensions between you party and its coalition partner, 00:09:21.841 --> 00:09:25.653 the Social Democrats. How do you see your relations 00:09:25.813 --> 00:09:30.479 after yesterday's and today's talks? Do you still see a future 00:09:30.647 --> 00:09:34.346 for the coalition in its current form? 00:09:34.454 --> 00:09:41.560 I'm mystified by your question because this isn't a topic 00:09:41.680 --> 00:09:46.246 from the coalition agreement 00:09:46.367 --> 00:09:49.240 or the government's policy program. 00:09:49.387 --> 00:09:54.239 This topic was introduced through the backdoor. 00:09:54.380 --> 00:09:57.259 That's how it happened. Everyone voted on it 00:09:57.380 --> 00:10:00.393 according to their conscience and principles. 00:10:00.513 --> 00:10:03.953 Based on this week's meetings, I believe that things 00:10:04.074 --> 00:10:06.980 are much clearer today than last week. 00:10:07.107 --> 00:10:11.686 And because things are now clear, namely that the question 00:10:11.840 --> 00:10:13.693 was unclear and misleading, 00:10:13.833 --> 00:10:16.593 I trust that both the coalition partners 00:10:16.714 --> 00:10:19.466 and everyone else can think this through. 00:10:19.587 --> 00:10:22.940 I don't base my view of the future of the coalition 00:10:23.100 --> 00:10:26.853 or relations with the party you mentioned 00:10:26.974 --> 00:10:28.760 on this case. 00:10:28.894 --> 00:10:31.793 I'm not interested in clearing things up, 00:10:31.940 --> 00:10:34.634 but rather in preparing a foundation 00:10:34.802 --> 00:10:37.788 that will respect the will of the people, 00:10:37.920 --> 00:10:39.886 while setting up a framework 00:10:40.053 --> 00:10:43.359 for the government to carry on its work. 00:10:44.873 --> 00:10:48.306 There are no disputes within the coalition. 00:10:48.800 --> 00:10:50.400 Thank you very much.