WEBVTT 00:00:03.797 --> 00:00:09.804 Dear journalists, welcome. As I have already mentioned, 00:00:09.924 --> 00:00:15.540 the organization of sporting events in Slovenia 00:00:15.660 --> 00:00:21.134 is an important opportunity for us, for the development of sports, 00:00:21.722 --> 00:00:26.457 tourism, the economy and it makes our country more recognizable. 00:00:27.506 --> 00:00:31.569 The government's support of organizing the Olympic Festival 00:00:31.690 --> 00:00:34.790 in Maribor was never in question, 00:00:34.910 --> 00:00:38.064 on the contrary. The previous government 00:00:38.184 --> 00:00:41.624 decided that we go ahead with this project. 00:00:42.001 --> 00:00:46.708 In 2022, we allocated €3 million 00:00:46.828 --> 00:00:50.206 for the renovation of Tabor sports hall. 00:00:50.326 --> 00:00:54.624 You know it has been renovated. 00:00:54.900 --> 00:00:59.561 In the Annual Sports Programme, 00:00:59.681 --> 00:01:02.806 this government provided €3 million for the renovation 00:01:02.926 --> 00:01:05.191 of Poljane stadium. 00:01:06.482 --> 00:01:09.991 The Sports Foundation will add €100,000. 00:01:10.985 --> 00:01:15.942 The state paid more than €6 million 00:01:16.062 --> 00:01:19.391 for the organization of the EYOF. 00:01:20.432 --> 00:01:23.340 We are talking about the infrastructure. 00:01:23.460 --> 00:01:26.778 We fulfilled our promise 00:01:26.898 --> 00:01:30.795 to build sporting infrastructure. 00:01:30.915 --> 00:01:35.952 After the EYOF, the infrastructure 00:01:36.072 --> 00:01:41.118 will be available to the citizens and I hope they will use it 00:01:41.457 --> 00:01:48.224 and that it will encourage young people to do sports. 00:01:48.547 --> 00:01:53.925 This will be one of the biggest events in Maribor 00:01:54.045 --> 00:02:00.391 and the organizers need €3 million more 00:02:01.252 --> 00:02:06.849 which the government provided today. 00:02:07.195 --> 00:02:10.031 The Ministry estimated 00:02:10.416 --> 00:02:15.977 that this event is very important. 00:02:16.902 --> 00:02:20.434 I just want to give you one piece of information. 00:02:20.554 --> 00:02:26.836 Almost 4,000 young people from all over Europe will come. 00:02:26.956 --> 00:02:29.724 They are 14-18 years old. 00:02:30.750 --> 00:02:34.829 1,000 other people will accompany them, 00:02:34.949 --> 00:02:38.582 coaches, accompanying people, and of course, there will be spectators. 00:02:38.702 --> 00:02:45.467 This is a big opportunity for Maribor and the surrounding cities 00:02:45.587 --> 00:02:49.197 and most of all, for Slovenia. Slovenia has proven 00:02:49.317 --> 00:02:52.691 to be a great host. 00:02:52.935 --> 00:02:57.989 When Maribor said they need €3 million, 00:02:58.109 --> 00:03:04.256 the PM and I were in contact with them every day. 00:03:04.376 --> 00:03:08.024 I want to thank the PM for the support. 00:03:08.909 --> 00:03:11.833 The Ministry has allocated the funds 00:03:11.953 --> 00:03:16.801 and we will give them €2.5 million for the organization 00:03:17.381 --> 00:03:21.520 and €325,000 for the sports equipment. 00:03:21.640 --> 00:03:26.245 We solved the issue. I look forward to the Festival. 00:03:26.474 --> 00:03:30.691 I have my fingers crossed for our athletes 00:03:30.811 --> 00:03:35.707 and I wish Maribor, the organizers and volunteers 00:03:36.272 --> 00:03:39.291 a good organization and I thank them. 00:03:39.411 --> 00:03:43.224 Thank you. Are there any questions? 00:03:44.281 --> 00:03:47.391 No? Something else? -Yes. 00:03:48.002 --> 00:03:52.429 Go ahead. It is you. I didn't see you. 00:03:53.518 --> 00:03:56.811 Metka Majer, Pop TV. I have a question regarding another topic. 00:03:56.931 --> 00:04:01.735 Go ahead. -It was already announced last week 00:04:01.855 --> 00:04:07.991 and now it happened. Vzajemna has filed a lawsuit 00:04:08.219 --> 00:04:14.816 because the premiums were limited. Did you talk about it? 00:04:14.936 --> 00:04:18.389 No. Thank you for the information. 00:04:18.509 --> 00:04:22.441 I saw it in the media that they will file a lawsuit 00:04:22.561 --> 00:04:26.487 because the government passed a decree 00:04:26.607 --> 00:04:31.760 to limit the price. The court will decide 00:04:32.278 --> 00:04:36.171 who is right. I think the government did something good for the citizens 00:04:36.291 --> 00:04:41.017 because the price was too high 00:04:41.138 --> 00:04:44.045 despite inflation. 00:04:44.165 --> 00:04:48.372 The Ministry passed 00:04:48.492 --> 00:04:52.057 the Law on Controlling Prices which made it possible 00:04:52.685 --> 00:04:56.703 to regulate the prices. The Ministry of Health 00:04:56.823 --> 00:05:01.724 made calculations and limited the price to €34.70. 00:05:02.820 --> 00:05:08.680 But, are you counting on it that it won't be justiciable? 00:05:08.874 --> 00:05:13.207 I don't dare to comment on the judicial proceedings, 00:05:13.327 --> 00:05:20.187 but the state shall be prepared to defend its decision. 00:05:21.287 --> 00:05:25.101 One more topic. Yesterday, the government has decided 00:05:25.247 --> 00:05:28.767 to remove the Law on Institutions from the proceedings. 00:05:29.021 --> 00:05:31.367 Did you have some doubts in SD? -Yes. 00:05:31.541 --> 00:05:35.254 On this topic. Why have you decided that? 00:05:35.961 --> 00:05:43.261 You know, how it is. Coalitions are always somewhat demanding. 00:05:43.527 --> 00:05:47.007 Each party has a little different view on something. 00:05:47.220 --> 00:05:55.147 We have estimated that this law could be controversial. 00:05:55.334 --> 00:05:59.400 And the government has on a correspondence session 00:05:59.654 --> 00:06:02.760 removed the law from proceedings. 00:06:02.900 --> 00:06:07.387 We have seen it all in the past. 00:06:07.587 --> 00:06:12.527 I am happy that we can withdraw a little 00:06:12.640 --> 00:06:15.227 to make a few steps forward in the future. 00:06:15.540 --> 00:06:19.020 Was this really suspended or are you going to review it? 00:06:19.154 --> 00:06:23.794 To be honest, at the moment, I can't... 00:06:24.067 --> 00:06:27.934 I don't know, what was agreed upon on the coalition summit, 00:06:28.107 --> 00:06:33.174 but the law as it is, won't be adopted. 00:06:33.507 --> 00:06:36.494 Thank you. -Thank you. -Thank you and goodbye. 00:06:36.587 --> 00:06:41.494 Nobody on the internet has a question. -I'm sorry, I just left. 00:06:41.660 --> 00:06:43.427 Okay. -Thank you. 00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:47.693 The next one is the Minister of Justice Dominika Švarc Pipan. 00:06:47.880 --> 00:06:52.060 The government has determined the text of the proposal 00:06:52.220 --> 00:06:55.074 for changing three Articles of the constitution, 00:06:55.194 --> 00:06:59.427 which could unburden the work of the Constitutional Tribunal. 00:07:00.867 --> 00:07:04.120 More about it shall tell us the Minister of Justice 00:07:04.267 --> 00:07:07.974 Dominika Švarc Pipan. -Hello. 00:07:08.520 --> 00:07:12.027 The government has today established the text of the proposal 00:07:12.200 --> 00:07:19.107 for changing the Articles 160, 161 and 162 of the constitution 00:07:19.420 --> 00:07:21.207 with the draft of the Constitutional Law. 00:07:21.347 --> 00:07:25.134 It referred them to the National Assembly for consideration. 00:07:25.400 --> 00:07:31.220 The main goal of this proposal is a better control in the Tribunal. 00:07:31.474 --> 00:07:35.760 For quite some time, it is alarming and it means a risk 00:07:35.994 --> 00:07:39.060 to the right to trial within a reasonable time. 00:07:39.380 --> 00:07:43.800 One of the factors of this tendency is a wide range of authority 00:07:43.934 --> 00:07:48.980 of the Constitutional Tribunal, which is not compliant with its role 00:07:49.227 --> 00:07:53.807 and it doesn't enable it to effectively fulfil its role. 00:07:54.094 --> 00:07:58.087 The Tribunal has a role as the Court of First Instance 00:07:58.307 --> 00:08:01.487 and as the highest keeper of the constitution and human rights. 00:08:01.780 --> 00:08:06.180 With its decisions should establish the high standards 00:08:06.407 --> 00:08:08.427 as a guide for other courts and agencies 00:08:08.540 --> 00:08:11.447 when deciding on the rights and obligations. 00:08:11.747 --> 00:08:14.467 Therefore, the core of the proposed solutions is 00:08:14.807 --> 00:08:17.300 to limit the range of this authority. 00:08:17.454 --> 00:08:21.234 However, not in a way that these limits shall lead 00:08:21.380 --> 00:08:26.434 to inappropriate restrictions of the right to access the Court. 00:08:26.920 --> 00:08:30.640 Our main guide was therefore to ensure 00:08:30.934 --> 00:08:34.420 a balance between the right to access the judicial protection 00:08:34.674 --> 00:08:38.080 and the right to trial in a reasonable time. 00:08:38.340 --> 00:08:40.520 To put it even more simply, 00:08:40.747 --> 00:08:44.580 the goal of this change is to ensure 00:08:44.780 --> 00:08:47.467 quicker and more effective protection of constitutionality 00:08:47.694 --> 00:08:53.314 and human rights without limiting the access to the Court. 00:08:54.107 --> 00:08:57.574 In this context, the solution of the proposed changes 00:08:57.720 --> 00:09:01.600 is introduction of so called relative or limited discretion 00:09:01.760 --> 00:09:05.420 of the Constitutional Tribunal in the selection of issues. 00:09:05.747 --> 00:09:10.567 I have to emphasize, this is not unlimited discretion 00:09:10.747 --> 00:09:13.687 or the right to free choice of the Tribunal. 00:09:13.960 --> 00:09:16.980 The proposal provides certain safeguards 00:09:17.114 --> 00:09:21.440 that avert the risk of excessive restrictions on access 00:09:21.587 --> 00:09:23.460 to the Constitutional Tribunal. 00:09:23.754 --> 00:09:27.407 Thus, the proposal provides that Constitutional Tribunal 00:09:27.580 --> 00:09:31.554 shall decide on its own, which issues it shall consider, 00:09:31.780 --> 00:09:36.080 but it has to take into account systemically important issues, 00:09:36.227 --> 00:09:40.874 importance of the constitutional question as a whole, 00:09:41.070 --> 00:09:44.704 as well as importance of the issues of the individual applicant 00:09:44.864 --> 00:09:47.227 or applicants of the constitutional complaint. 00:09:47.387 --> 00:09:51.394 It has to consider the importance of the violated human rights 00:09:51.587 --> 00:09:53.320 and fundamental freedoms. 00:09:53.500 --> 00:09:57.060 As additional, and in my opinion important safeguard or restriction 00:09:57.200 --> 00:10:00.487 of the discretionary right, is an anticipation in the proposal 00:10:00.569 --> 00:10:03.986 that the decision on whether the Constitutional Court 00:10:04.107 --> 00:10:06.013 will accept the case or not 00:10:06.134 --> 00:10:09.315 can be made by a minority of three Constitutional Court judges. 00:10:09.436 --> 00:10:12.347 A positive vote of three Constitutional Court judges 00:10:12.468 --> 00:10:16.807 will be sufficient for the court to accept the case. 00:10:17.097 --> 00:10:20.557 One more safeguard, or an additional risk, 00:10:20.678 --> 00:10:25.201 limiting access to constitutional protection reduces the wide circle 00:10:25.322 --> 00:10:28.061 of so-called privileged petitioners, 00:10:28.182 --> 00:10:30.588 which would only be defined in the Constitution. 00:10:30.709 --> 00:10:35.397 Now this is a matter of law. These are those petitioners 00:10:35.518 --> 00:10:39.724 whose petitions the Constitutional Court must always consider. 00:10:39.845 --> 00:10:42.878 It is also new that this list would now also include 00:10:42.999 --> 00:10:46.103 the President of the Republic among other authorities. 00:10:46.224 --> 00:10:49.857 Let me mention only a few other more important changes 00:10:49.978 --> 00:10:51.601 this proposal foresees. 00:10:51.722 --> 00:10:53.529 One of the key ones 00:10:53.650 --> 00:10:56.901 is the possibility that in the future the legislator 00:10:57.022 --> 00:11:01.028 could transfer certain other powers of the Constitutional Court 00:11:01.149 --> 00:11:04.205 to another competent court, to the regular courts, 00:11:04.326 --> 00:11:07.934 by means of a law passed with a simple two-thirds majority. 00:11:08.055 --> 00:11:10.816 The proposal of the constitutional law adopted today 00:11:10.937 --> 00:11:13.910 explicitly foresees the transfer of certain powers 00:11:14.039 --> 00:11:16.062 from the Constitutional to the Administrative Court, 00:11:16.183 --> 00:11:18.791 namely the decision on disputes regarding jurisdiction 00:11:18.912 --> 00:11:20.916 between the state and the local community 00:11:21.037 --> 00:11:23.037 and between the local communities themselves, 00:11:23.158 --> 00:11:25.196 and the assessment of the constitutionality 00:11:25.317 --> 00:11:28.558 and legality of spatial executive acts. 00:11:29.308 --> 00:11:31.392 Thank you. Any questions? 00:11:31.660 --> 00:11:33.260 Yes. -Go ahead. 00:11:36.512 --> 00:11:38.292 Metka Majer, Pop TV. 00:11:38.973 --> 00:11:43.371 What was the reason for these changes? 00:11:43.492 --> 00:11:46.989 Is there some consensus in the coalition regarding this? 00:11:47.110 --> 00:11:49.194 I assume there is. 00:11:49.346 --> 00:11:51.202 What does that mean in numbers, 00:11:51.323 --> 00:11:54.896 how much would that relieve the Constitutional Court? 00:11:55.017 --> 00:11:56.617 Thank you. 00:11:56.738 --> 00:11:59.596 Yes, the proposal is coalition-coordinated, 00:11:59.717 --> 00:12:01.504 that's why we are submitting it. 00:12:01.625 --> 00:12:04.367 The agreement was for the proposal to be submitted by the Government, 00:12:04.488 --> 00:12:07.302 because it is a very professional issue, 00:12:07.423 --> 00:12:15.396 and it has broad professional and political or coalition support. 00:12:15.517 --> 00:12:17.386 We hope that the proposal will be considered 00:12:17.507 --> 00:12:19.636 at the next session of the Constitutional Commission 00:12:19.757 --> 00:12:22.294 scheduled for the end of May. 00:12:22.415 --> 00:12:26.640 As I mentioned, the key goal and therefore also the key reason 00:12:26.761 --> 00:12:28.767 for this proposed amendment 00:12:28.888 --> 00:12:32.397 is the ever-worsening caseload of the Constitutional Court. 00:12:32.518 --> 00:12:36.924 The total sum of pending cases at the end of the year 00:12:37.045 --> 00:12:40.645 has been increasing for almost a decade. 00:12:40.766 --> 00:12:46.293 The idea of changes such as we are proposing today is not entirely new. 00:12:46.414 --> 00:12:50.934 A similar, slightly different idea was proposed in 2010. 00:12:51.055 --> 00:12:54.947 But at that time it did not receive sufficient support. 00:12:55.068 --> 00:12:57.322 The essential difference from that proposal is 00:12:57.443 --> 00:13:00.705 that at that time it provided a practically absolute discretion 00:13:00.826 --> 00:13:04.586 of the Constitutional Court to choose which cases to consider. 00:13:04.707 --> 00:13:08.818 As said, we introduce certain safeguards in this proposal. 00:13:08.939 --> 00:13:12.886 This is also the part where we expect the greatest effect 00:13:13.007 --> 00:13:17.614 for reducing the number of pending cases in the annual reports. 00:13:17.735 --> 00:13:19.943 That is, faster resolution of cases, 00:13:20.064 --> 00:13:22.380 because currently the Constitutional Court 00:13:22.501 --> 00:13:25.695 receives an extremely large number of cases, 00:13:25.816 --> 00:13:29.010 initiatives and constitutional appeals every year. 00:13:29.172 --> 00:13:31.443 It has to deal with each one individually, 00:13:31.564 --> 00:13:34.437 and this also causes these big delays. 00:13:34.558 --> 00:13:37.997 That's why we went for this solution that will be crucial. 00:13:38.118 --> 00:13:40.196 So the Constitutional Court has some kind 00:13:40.317 --> 00:13:44.585 of free choice to a certain extent which cases it will consider. 00:13:44.706 --> 00:13:48.387 Have you reached out to the opposition regarding the changes? 00:13:48.508 --> 00:13:50.897 We discussed or presented the proposal 00:13:51.018 --> 00:13:53.514 to all coalition parliamentary groups, 00:13:53.635 --> 00:13:57.639 as well as preliminarily to the NSi. 00:13:57.760 --> 00:14:00.081 During the proceedings 00:14:00.202 --> 00:14:04.414 we will of course also present it to the SDS parliamentary group. 00:14:04.535 --> 00:14:07.751 Then the Constitutional Commission will see how much support 00:14:07.872 --> 00:14:10.083 there is for the proposal. 00:14:10.802 --> 00:14:15.396 But no current case is a reason for this? 00:14:15.517 --> 00:14:17.741 As said, this is a professional debate 00:14:17.862 --> 00:14:20.883 that has been going on for more than a decade. 00:14:21.004 --> 00:14:23.948 Until now, in some way, even in the past mandates, 00:14:24.069 --> 00:14:27.394 at first glance there wasn't sufficient majority for support 00:14:27.515 --> 00:14:30.254 or this proposal has not been renewed in the past. 00:14:30.375 --> 00:14:33.715 We are in a situation where the caseload of the Constitutional Court 00:14:33.836 --> 00:14:36.209 is really becoming so problematic that people, 00:14:36.330 --> 00:14:38.300 especially in the procedures of constitutional appeals 00:14:38.421 --> 00:14:40.896 due to alleged violations of human rights, 00:14:41.017 --> 00:14:43.954 are waiting for a decision of the Constitutional Court 00:14:44.075 --> 00:14:47.406 for several years. You know the same goes for citizens 00:14:47.527 --> 00:14:50.340 in proceedings for the constitutional review 00:14:50.461 --> 00:14:52.380 of constitutionality and legality. 00:14:52.402 --> 00:14:54.746 There are cases of procedures 00:14:54.867 --> 00:14:59.754 on the previous government's anti-corona decrees, 00:14:59.875 --> 00:15:03.129 where issues needed to be resolved quickly 00:15:03.250 --> 00:15:07.414 for the Constitutional Court's decision to have any effect, 00:15:07.535 --> 00:15:12.000 but it took so long that the legislation was no longer in force. 00:15:12.121 --> 00:15:15.223 This broad range of competencies 00:15:15.395 --> 00:15:18.816 and the fact that the Constitutional Court 00:15:18.937 --> 00:15:25.785 receives a range of issues that may or may not be within its remit 00:15:25.957 --> 00:15:29.741 have led to a situation where the Constitutional Court 00:15:29.862 --> 00:15:34.155 often passes judgement on matters that are no longer relevant 00:15:34.276 --> 00:15:37.429 or the violations can no longer be remedied. 00:15:38.851 --> 00:15:42.991 I have other questions. -Any more questions on this topic? 00:15:44.471 --> 00:15:47.909 You have already responded on social media 00:15:48.268 --> 00:15:54.648 to recent events related to the abolishment of a holiday. 00:15:55.789 --> 00:15:58.710 How would you comment the accusation 00:15:58.831 --> 00:16:02.343 that the Coalition is declaring a new civil war? 00:16:03.007 --> 00:16:06.601 I deeply regret that ideological differences 00:16:06.722 --> 00:16:09.546 and ideological discussions, 00:16:09.667 --> 00:16:13.256 which often reach points of conflict 00:16:13.377 --> 00:16:17.694 between political parties and even citizens, 00:16:17.991 --> 00:16:22.389 have now escalated to a completely different level. 00:16:22.526 --> 00:16:29.456 To the level of a call to arms, violence and self-defence. 00:16:29.577 --> 00:16:35.057 A narrative or rather rhetoric of civil war, 00:16:35.178 --> 00:16:38.742 which leads to the intimidation of the people 00:16:38.863 --> 00:16:44.378 and can also lead to further unpredictable escalation 00:16:44.499 --> 00:16:49.925 toward actual outbreaks of violence or the use of force. 00:16:50.584 --> 00:16:53.748 As evidenced by recent tragic events 00:16:53.869 --> 00:16:57.580 in our neighbourhood and around the world 00:16:57.701 --> 00:17:01.705 such calls can, intentionally as well as unintentionally, 00:17:01.826 --> 00:17:05.412 prompt people to take matters into their own hands. 00:17:05.533 --> 00:17:10.155 This is completely unacceptable. I emphasised on Twitter yesterday 00:17:10.276 --> 00:17:14.421 that ideological differences and discussions are one thing. 00:17:14.542 --> 00:17:18.343 We can even argue, though both sides would rather not. 00:17:18.538 --> 00:17:23.398 Ideological debates always become emotional and heated, 00:17:23.538 --> 00:17:26.046 but that is entirely different 00:17:26.167 --> 00:17:30.007 from actually starting a rhetoric of civil war 00:17:30.218 --> 00:17:33.338 and calling to violence in this context. 00:17:33.577 --> 00:17:35.757 Yesterday we also reported 00:17:35.878 --> 00:17:40.389 a suspicion of criminal conduct related to these tweets 00:17:40.510 --> 00:17:43.022 to the appropriate authorities 00:17:43.143 --> 00:17:47.835 and today we sent an official notification of criminal conduct 00:17:47.956 --> 00:17:50.960 to the District State Prosecutor's Office. 00:17:51.202 --> 00:17:55.091 It is a report of various criminal acts, 00:17:55.212 --> 00:18:02.552 which are seen as hate speech under Article 297. 00:18:02.673 --> 00:18:09.384 The suspected criminal acts include public incitement of violence, 00:18:09.505 --> 00:18:14.769 as well as calling to armed revolt 00:18:14.890 --> 00:18:18.228 and overturning the constitutional order. 00:18:18.470 --> 00:18:22.087 This matter will now be taken over and continued 00:18:22.208 --> 00:18:26.683 by the appropriate investigative and prosecutorial authorities. 00:18:26.804 --> 00:18:30.874 The Ministry of Justice has officially sent this report 00:18:30.995 --> 00:18:34.604 to the District State Prosecutor's Office today. 00:18:35.759 --> 00:18:43.759 All right, I have some other questions, also regarding violence. 00:18:43.880 --> 00:18:48.312 New Slovenia presented a range of proposals today 00:18:48.433 --> 00:18:54.218 regarding violence in schools due to recent events. 00:18:54.339 --> 00:19:00.117 They would like the Ministry of Justice to examine the option 00:19:00.238 --> 00:19:04.251 of instituting a criminal act of online violence 00:19:04.372 --> 00:19:08.829 like certain European countries. What is your opinion on this? 00:19:08.956 --> 00:19:11.988 I do not know about these proposals yet 00:19:12.109 --> 00:19:15.801 as I have been in the government meeting until now. 00:19:15.922 --> 00:19:22.559 We will examine them and comment on them when we are able to. 00:19:23.473 --> 00:19:27.309 One more question. Regarding the public sector, 00:19:27.430 --> 00:19:32.083 new guidelines and a new mandate were to be decided on today. 00:19:32.434 --> 00:19:37.325 This applies to your area as well. What has been said regarding this? 00:19:37.559 --> 00:19:42.282 This is a question for the Minister of Public Administration. 00:19:42.403 --> 00:19:46.977 We did come to certain agreements, but it would be more appropriate 00:19:47.098 --> 00:19:51.387 for the Minister of Public Administration to comment on this. 00:19:51.551 --> 00:19:54.192 Regarding the Ministry of Justice, 00:19:54.313 --> 00:19:57.465 there are two dimensions to these talks. 00:19:57.629 --> 00:20:01.713 Part of our stakeholders is from the public sector, 00:20:01.834 --> 00:20:06.598 whom the current negotiations guidelines concern. 00:20:06.762 --> 00:20:09.018 Another part are officials, 00:20:09.253 --> 00:20:13.313 prosecutors, judges and a few state attorneys, 00:20:13.434 --> 00:20:16.280 who are discussing the wage reform 00:20:16.401 --> 00:20:19.420 with the Ministry of Public Administration 00:20:19.541 --> 00:20:23.963 separately from public sector unions. Just to clarify. 00:20:24.143 --> 00:20:27.558 And how do these negotiations go? 00:20:27.705 --> 00:20:31.620 I believe that the officials' negotiations 00:20:31.792 --> 00:20:35.393 have lately become more constructive. 00:20:35.514 --> 00:20:38.534 We have intensified these meetings. 00:20:38.745 --> 00:20:41.268 There was a change in the meantime 00:20:41.389 --> 00:20:45.175 where judges negotiated separately from prosecutors. 00:20:45.362 --> 00:20:47.946 I said that I find this inappropriate 00:20:48.067 --> 00:20:51.352 and that they should have these talks together. 00:20:51.473 --> 00:20:53.549 We have reached this agreement 00:20:53.670 --> 00:20:57.815 and negotiations with the Ministry of Public Administration 00:20:57.936 --> 00:21:02.591 are now continuing with both judges and prosecutors. Thank you. 00:21:02.875 --> 00:21:04.555 Any other questions? 00:21:05.906 --> 00:21:09.968 No? -Thank you. -Thank you all for attending.